Home / News / Artificial sweeteners in energy drink...
Artificial sweeteners in energy drinks, and the cleaner alternatives
Turn over a can of just about any zero-sugar energy drink and you'll usually see two, sometimes three artificial sweeteners in the ingredient list. Sucralose is the most common. Aspartame shows up a lot too. Acesulfame potassium, often written as acesulfame K or "ace-K," is the third one that keeps appearing.
None of that is hidden. It's just sitting there in the ingredients, in a font small enough that most people never read it. If you've ever wondered why zero-sugar drinks taste the way they do, or why you sometimes feel a weird aftertaste an hour later, this is the section of the label to know.
The three sweeteners you'll see the most
Sucralose
The most common artificial sweetener in energy drinks. It's roughly 600 times sweeter than sugar, has no calories, and is heat-stable. Brands like it because tiny amounts sweeten a whole can, and it costs almost nothing to add.
The tradeoff is taste. Some people don't notice sucralose at all. Others describe a slightly synthetic sweetness or a lingering aftertaste, especially at higher doses.
Aspartame
Another zero-calorie option, about 200 times sweeter than sugar. It's been around longer than sucralose, and it's in a lot of diet sodas as well as energy drinks. The label sometimes lists it, sometimes hides it inside a blend.
Aspartame breaks down at higher temperatures, so it's less useful in things that get heated. Some people describe its aftertaste as more chemical. Others don't notice.
Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K)
The third of the "big three." Often used together with sucralose or aspartame, because pairing sweeteners can round out the flavor and hide the aftertaste each one has alone. If you see two artificial sweeteners on the same can, that's usually why.
Why brands use them
It comes down to three things:
- Cost: pennies per can to sweeten with sucralose or aspartame, compared to natural alternatives.
- Zero calories: important for "sugar-free" labels and calorie-conscious buyers.
- Sweetness power: a tiny dose does the whole job, which makes the formula easier to build.
None of that is inherently sinister. It's just optimization. And once one brand does it and hits margins that make the category work, everyone else follows, because it's hard to compete against a cheaper input.
The cleaner alternatives
A newer wave of drinks (and some older ones) skip the artificial route entirely and use plant-based or fermentation-derived sweeteners instead. The three worth knowing:
Allulose
A rare sugar that occurs naturally in small amounts in fruits like figs and raisins. Tastes almost exactly like sugar, without the calorie load. It's absorbed but not metabolized the same way as regular sugar, so it doesn't spike blood sugar for most people. Costs more than sucralose. Tastes cleaner.
Monk fruit
An extract from a small green fruit grown in southern China. Very sweet, no calories, with a slightly softer profile than allulose. Used in tiny amounts. Often paired with allulose to balance the sweetness.
Stevia
Extracted from the stevia leaf. Zero calories, plant-based. Some people love it. Others taste a bitter or "green" note in the finish. Modern stevia extracts have gotten a lot cleaner than the early versions.
What ReadySet uses
Energy+ is sweetened with allulose and monk fruit. No sucralose. No aspartame. No acesulfame potassium. Zero sugar. The combination reads clean and finishes without a lingering aftertaste.
Protein+ uses the same base plus a small amount of stevia to balance out the higher protein density. Same rules apply: no artificial sweeteners, and everything is on the label at its exact place.
We picked this combination on purpose. The plant-based route costs more per can, but the payoff is a drink you can taste and immediately clock as "not one of the diet-soda-tasting energy drinks." That was worth the input cost.
Common questions
Are sucralose and aspartame safe?
Both are approved by regulators around the world at typical intake levels. The reason people avoid them is more about experience and personal preference than raw safety. If you don't love the taste or don't want the artificial route, cleaner options exist now.
Does allulose spike blood sugar?
For most people, no. Allulose is absorbed but not metabolized like regular sugar. If you're tracking blood glucose closely, check with your care team.
Why do so many drinks pair two artificial sweeteners?
Because each one has an aftertaste, and pairing them tends to mask the individual profiles. It's a formulation shortcut.
Why does "sugar-free" not automatically mean "clean"?
Because sugar-free just means no added sugar. It says nothing about how the drink was sweetened instead. The interesting question isn't "is there sugar?" It's "what did they use instead?"
You don't have to avoid artificial sweeteners. Millions of people drink them daily and are fine. But if you'd rather your zero-sugar drink taste like something you'd actually want to sip slowly, the label is where that decision starts. Look at what's sweetening the can, not just what isn't.
For the full label checklist we run through when comparing drinks, see the clean energy drink checklist.
Try the clean version
Grab the Mixed 4-Pack and taste both Energy+ and Protein+ before you commit.